What we learned
2/3
of what the analyst set out to learn is established. The rest is on your agenda.
2
answered
established with evidence
0
in conflict
teams contradict each other
1
still open
pressed, but unresolved
answeredhighretention
Impact on retention and attrition
“Voluntary attrition hit 18% last year and exit interviews overwhelmingly cite burnout; a 4-day week is the single most-requested benefit in our engagement survey.” — VP People
answeredmediumhiring
Effect on hiring and employer brand
“It would widen top-of-funnel meaningfully — comparable pilots became a recruiting headline. Comp benchmarks are unaffected since pay is flat.” — Talent Lead
gaplowcompliance
Legal / overtime exposure for non-exempt staff
“I'd have to check with counsel — I won't guess on wage-and-hour.” — VP People
pressed twice; no one could confirm how 32h interacts with non-exempt overtime rules
Risks & open concerns
Surfaced when the analyst asked what worries people that the agenda missed.
off-agendafairness
Morale could split if only some teams can take the 4th day off
“If support and ops can't realistically take Fridays off but everyone else can, that resentment will be worse than no pilot at all.”
Nothing here is made up
The analyst starts with no figures of its own. It can only repeat numbers it looks up in your records — and if a number isn't on file, it says “unknown” instead of guessing.
0/0
Every number the analyst gave, it looked up first. 0 of 0 lookups found a real entry and used that exact figure; anything it couldn’t find was left blank, never guessed. The records it pulled from are listed below.
The conversations behind it
opening / follow
targeted probe (pushback on a vague answer)
corroboration (source masked to debias)
grade gate under each answer